My People Are Destroyed For Lack of Knowledge

          M inak theology cu A.D. 1969s lio hrawng khan chaklei Amerika (North America) ram in aa thokmi asi. Minak Theology cu minak pawl nih ram uknaklei ah siseh, zatlang nun ah siseh, sipuazi lei zong in siseh, luat zalonnak an hmuh khawh nakding ah tial hnawh chanmi theology asi. [1] Minak theology cu minak caah asi (theology of ‘blackness). V. Cruz nih James Cone bia char than in a fianterning ah cun minak/nahnak (blackness) cu, ‘Amerika ram i a ummi takvun nakmi he zeihmanh pehtlaihnak a ngei lo, a ngeih hmanh ah tlawmte lawng aa pehtlai lai. Nahnak (blackness) nih a sawh duh taktakmi cu thinlung, nunnak, ruahnak in ‘nahnak’ kha a chim duhmi asi,’ ati. [2] Frem zong nih, “Pathian he kan ipehtlaihnak hi kan takvun ‘nahnak’ he zeihmah aa pehtlaimi asi lo. Kan thinlung (heart), nunnak (soul), le ruahnak (mind) he aa pehtlaimi asi,” tiah a fehter ve. [3] Minak theology nih cun ‘zeicahdah takvun ‘nahnak’ lawng cu sual nan puh, Pathian lila hmanh hi a takvun a nak ve ko da

                                                                                              Black Theology                        Black theology is a phenomenon of the 1960s in North America.  And it is a theology of black liberation [1] on the political, social, and economic condition. Black theology also is a theology of ‘blackness.’ Blackness refers, as V. Cruz says, “In Cone’s word, ‘being black in America has very little to do with skin color. To be black means that your heart, your soul, your mind, and your body are where the dispossessed are.’” [2] And Frem also affirms, “Being reconciled to God does not mean that one’s skin is physically black. It essentially depends on the color of your heart, soul, and mind.” [3] Black theology even considers God as black, as Noel Erskine rightly affirms, “God is black because through identification with the oppressed, God has made the black condition God’s own.” [4] The concept of black theology is widely relevant to the tribal com

Minung Lungthin Umtuning Phun 4 (The Four Temperaments) Hippocrates hi (460-370 B.C.) hrawngah a rak um mi asi i sii lei ah thiamsang tatak mi a rak si ruangah Grik vawlei pi ah minthang ngaingai mi a rak si (Sii lei ah cun pa bik dirhmun in an rak hmuh mi asi—he was known to be father of medicine) . Cu pa nih cun, minung ziaza le sining phun li in a then. Cu hna cu; sanguine, melancholic, choleric le phlegmatic hna an si. A tanglei ah a tawifiannak in an dernak le an caknak kan von langhter hmanh lai. ( Immanuel Kant nih a langhter ning kha Tim Lahaye sin in ka von itleng chinmi asi ). A. An dernak le an caknak (weaknesses and strengths)   1.       Sanguine: - Mi nuam le ruahchannak tampi ngei mi asi. Cun, ruahnak thatha zong a chuah khawh pinah biapi ngai in thil a ruat nain a dongh tiang a tuah kho ballo. A philh peng. Bia aa kammi le a biakhiahmi zulh le dirpi peng a duh ko nain a zul kho bal fawn lo. Mi puar le mi lungkhong asilo nain a sualnak hngalhter cu

Hi biahalnak hi keimah pumpak zong nih ka hal tawn lengmang hna. Cun, keimah le mah zong kaa hal tawn i midang zong nih an ka hal tawn ve. Hihi minung cungah si loin Pathian cungah aa hngatmi deuh khi a rak si. Hi bantuk bia kan hal tikah minung kan biahal si loin Pathian kan biahal bantuk asi fawn—Pathian nih a tuahmi khamhnak kong, bia hal khi asi. Ngaihchia ngai asi, tiah ka ruahmi cu cheukhat nih raltha tukin ‘mah le mah’ aa that mi cu hell ah an kal lai, tiah a chim colhmi hi asi. Cu ruangah cun, mi tampi nih mah le mah aa that mi poah cu (zumtu asi zongah zumlotu asi zongah) khamhnak sung dingin ruah an si, hell kal colh dingin ruah an si. Hi bantuk cawnpiaknak hi Baibal he aa kalhmi cawnpiaknak asi. Baibal nih a kan cawnpiakmi cu Jesuh Khrih kha Bawi le Khamhtu ah kan von cohlan bak khan khamh kan si i zungzal nunnak pek kan si colh (Johan 3:16). Baibal ning cun, zumtu nih cun zungzal nunnak an ngei ti kha fiangte in kan hngalh (1 Johan 5:13). Zeicatiah, Pa Pathian