Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from March 1, 2017

Jesuh vs Muhammad: Aa Dang Ngaingai Mi Lam Pahnih

Jesuh vs Muhammad: Aa Dang Ngaingai Mi Lam Pahnih ************************************************************************* Philosophy a cawng mi paoh nih cun theih cio asi lai, tiah ka ruah. Cucu, ningcang tein bia-al ziathiamnak (logical argument) he a pehtlaimi ‘aa kalh kho lomi phunglam’ (the law of non-contradictory) hi asi. A fawinak cun, ‘aa kalhmi thil pahnih kha an dik veve kho lo’ ti khi asi. Phundang in cun, ‘pakhat’ kha ‘pakhat’ asi lioah ‘pahnih’ asi kho lo. Phundang in chim than ahcun, thil dik pakhat a um. Cu thil dik cu, aa khat lomi ‘aphi’ pahnih in na ruahdamh—tahchunhnak ah ‘pakhat asiloah pahnih asi lai’ tiah na ruahdamh. Cu na ruahdamhmi chungah cun ‘an pahnih’ te cun an dik veve kho lo. Pakhat a dik ahcun a dang pakhat cu a palh hrimhrim lai. Asiloah, an pahnih te in an palh khawh veve fawn—‘hihi maw, khikhi dek’ asiloah ‘hihi zong asi lo, khikhi zong asi lo’ (either this…or that (or) neither of….them). Cucu, the law of non-contradictory timi cu asi.  Va

Topical Sermon vs. Expository Sermon (I)

Topical Sermon vs Expository Sermon (Part I) *********************************************************** (Laimi nih kan herhmi maw kan tuah lai kan duhmi ah dah kan i bual rih ko lai?) An ka chimhning ah cun thawngtha chimning asiloah timhtuahning hi phun 7 hrawng, a tlangpi in an um. Cu lakah cun, hman bikmi tiah ruahmi le a tlawm-tam in a dang sermon phun zong an tel dih tiah ruahmi hna cu topical sermon le expository sermon an si, an ti.  Topical sermon timi cu a fawinak in ‘tlangtaar’ a ngei. Cu tlangtaarmi he a pehtlaimi Baibal caang paoh laak khawh asi. Cun, Baibal caang thimmi chungin biafang pakhat te zong maw, biatluan pakhat te zong maw asiloah phundang deuh in tamhmoih khawh asi i a dang Baibal caang tampi he komh in thawngtha na chim khawh. Tchnak; Rom 1:1 Khrih Jesuh sal le Pathian nih a Thawngtha chim awkah a thim i a auhmi lamkaltu keimah Paul nih ca kan kuat hna, timi ah hin “Khrih Jesuh Sal” “Thawngtha chim a biapitnak” (phundang zongin na tuah kh

Buddha vs. Jesuh

BUDDHA vs. JESUH (Zeiruangah dah Buddhist ka si lo?) Buddha le Jesuh an idannak hi phun tampi langhter khawh asi ko hnga. Cu lakah hrelh awk a tha lo, tiah ka ruahmi tlawmpal tein ka von langhter hmanh hna lai. Hi capar hi biaknak dohdal duh ruangah tialmi asi lo. Careltu nih kan mah duhmi thim khawhnak nawl kan ngei, ti zong von fianter chap ka duh.  1.    Zeitluk in tuanbia minung taktak an si a biapi? BUDDHA: Buddhism ah khuaruahhar ngai le nihchuak ngai zong asi tiah ka ruahmi pakhat cu Buddha um/tel loin Buddhism a um kho mi hi asi. Kum 1960 lioah Paul Tillich nih Japan Buddhist theologian pawl bia a halmi hna cu, “Tuanbia thiamsang (historian) pawl nih hin Gautama hi a um taktak lo, tiah fehter hna sehlaw Buddhism hi zeidah a cang hnga?” ti asi. Japan Buddhist theologian pawl nih, “Buddhism cu Dharma kaya timi ‘biatak’ ah aa hngatmi a si i cu biatak cu zungzal a hmunmi asi, tiah kan ruah. Cucaah, tuanbia chungah Gautama um le um lo nih lai a rel lo. Gautama a u